STEU and STEM: understanding and managing emotions
STEU and STEM are performance-oriented situational tests developed by Carolyn MacCann and Richard Roberts. STEU targets emotional understanding; STEM targets emotion management. They examine different aspects of emotional reasoning and are not interchangeable with a broad self-report EQ score.
Editorially checked
Explore your emotions and relationships with the free EQTiger assessment.
By EQTiger Editorial. Review status: needs-expert-review. Qualified review is pending; the review date records an editorial check.
Two related tests with different questions
The Situational Test of Emotional Understanding and Situational Test of Emotion Management were introduced in MacCann and Roberts' 2008 development paper. The tests use situations to examine emotional understanding and management, with studies investigating relationships to other measures. Their purpose was to explore alternative approaches to performance-based EI assessment. (MacCann and Roberts, 2008)
In broad terms, understanding concerns reasoning about emotional responses to circumstances; management concerns evaluating ways to respond. This guide does not reproduce scenarios, response options, or scoring. A situational format can look familiar to someone who has taken a workplace quiz, but appearance alone does not establish that the instruments use the same model, criteria, or interpretation.
Strengths and limits of the approach
The development work offers a way to investigate specific emotional reasoning targets rather than only a global self-description. The evidence comes from particular study samples, so it should not be treated as automatic support for every population or use. (MacCann and Roberts, 2008)
For a reader or practitioner, the narrow targets are both useful and limiting. If the question is about emotional understanding, a focused measure may fit it. If the question is about all aspects of interpersonal functioning, that broader claim needs additional support. Knowing how a hypothetical situation might be handled also leaves open what the person will do when facing competing demands in an actual interaction.
Research use and availability
STEU and STEM are encountered in ability EI research. Before using them, identify the exact form and locate its author or publisher instructions, including any conditions for access, reproduction, scoring, and translation. Availability of a development article does not establish unrestricted rights to deploy every associated instrument. This page is an explanatory guide, not an authorized administration or downloadable test bank.
If comparing studies, keep the two tests separate and note any shortened or revised forms. A result about one should not silently become a claim about the other. Ask which outcome the researchers examined and whether the interpretation stays within that scope. This is particularly important when a summary compresses several emotion measures into the single phrase emotional intelligence and loses the distinct task each one used.
How EQTiger differs
EQTiger includes its own scenario judgments and self-reported habits in a 36-item reflection assessment. It does not administer STEU or STEM, copy their items, or apply their scoring. Its judgment component describes responses within the EQTiger framework and does not establish equivalence to either research measure. The descriptive 0 to 100 EQTiger scale cannot be used to convert or reinterpret STEU or STEM results.
For original practice, recall a disagreement and ask two separate questions: what information helped you understand the feelings involved, and what made your response useful or unhelpful? Notice that a good answer to the first does not automatically produce a good answer to the second. This is general reflection rather than test preparation. The assessment link offers a separate EQTiger experience, while the cited paper explains the named instruments' development.
Sources
- Carolyn MacCann, Richard D. Roberts (2008). New paradigms for assessing emotional intelligence: Theory and data. Emotion, 8(4), 540-551. doi.org/10.1037/a0012746
Start the free EQTiger assessment for adults 18+. The free result includes a profile and strongest area; numeric scores and bands belong to the optional paid report. See methodology and limitations.
Related
- No. 01MSCEIT: model, editions, strengths, and limitsThe MSCEIT is a performance-based measure associated with the ability model of emotional intelligence. The original instrument and MSCEIT 2 are different editions, so research and administration details must be matched to the version. EQTiger is not an MSCEIT administration or equivalent score.
- No. 02SREIS: self-rated EI and its limitsHere SREIS means the Self-Rated Emotional Intelligence Scale used by Brackett and colleagues, including a revised 19-item form. It asks for self-perceptions mapped to an ability-model framework. It is distinct from the Schutte scale, which is sometimes described with confusingly similar abbreviations.
- No. 03WLEIS: Wong and Law EI scale explainedThe Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale is a 16-item self-report measure linked to an ability-model framework. Its four areas concern appraising one’s own and others’ emotions, using emotion, and regulating emotion. The self-report format must remain distinct from demonstrated performance.
Your next 9 minutes
Understand your emotions.
36 questions about everyday moments. A fresh starting point for reflection.
Free to take. Full report $6.95. One-time payment. No subscription.