SREIS: self-rated EI and its limits
Here SREIS means the Self-Rated Emotional Intelligence Scale used by Brackett and colleagues, including a revised 19-item form. It asks for self-perceptions mapped to an ability-model framework. It is distinct from the Schutte scale, which is sometimes described with confusingly similar abbreviations.
Editorially checked
Explore your emotions and relationships with the free EQTiger assessment.
By EQTiger Editorial. Review status: needs-expert-review. Qualified review is pending; the review date records an editorial check.
Check the name and version first
Brackett and colleagues' 2006 paper compared self-rated emotional abilities with performance measurement. It describes a revised 19-item SREIS form organized around the Mayer-Salovey framework. Respondents rate how well statements describe them. The conceptual connection to an ability model does not turn the self-report task into a performance test. (Brackett and colleagues, 2006)
Because abbreviations are inconsistent across some summaries, record the authors, year, and item count when identifying a scale. SREIS on this page does not mean the Schutte 33-item inventory. If a research report uses a similar acronym, check its methods section rather than assuming the measures are identical. That small bibliographic check prevents combining evidence from different questionnaires under one label.
What the research can tell you
The original comparison found that self-ratings and performance scores were not strongly aligned. That supports treating perceived emotional ability and task performance as different sources of information, rather than substituting one result for the other. The findings belong to the studied samples and methods. (Brackett and colleagues, 2006)
A useful interpretation asks why self-perception is relevant to the question being studied. Someone's confidence in understanding emotions may matter, but it does not establish how they handled a particular interaction. Likewise, a task score does not tell you everything about their experience of themselves. Differences can motivate further questions about context and behavior without proving that the respondent intentionally misrepresented anything.
Who uses it and what access requires
SREIS appears in academic work on self-perceived emotional abilities and their relationship to other measures. The cited paper provides development context, not an unrestricted commercial license for every use of its materials. Check the rights and conditions for the exact version and purpose with the relevant author or publisher. This guide does not reproduce items or provide an administration and scoring service.
If you are reading a study, ask whether the authors used the original or revised form, which response format they used, and whether they changed any wording. Those details affect comparability. If you are considering administering a questionnaire, do not copy a secondary website's version without confirming its provenance. A convenient form may omit the version information needed to connect results to the literature.
How EQTiger differs
EQTiger uses its own habit items and scenario judgments across six dimensions. Its outputs are descriptive 0 to 100 EQTiger scores, not SREIS totals or validated estimates of ability. The assessment's judgment-versus-habits view is an internal reflection aid; it is not a replication of the research comparison between SREIS and MSCEIT and should not be interpreted as one.
For original practice, write how you would describe your listening, then recall a conversation in which the other person corrected your understanding. Ask what the correction reveals about your first impression. This exercise explores the relationship between self-view and examples without producing a research score. Use the EQTiger link below for a separate reflection experience, and the paper for understanding the actual SREIS study.
Sources
- Marc A. Brackett, Susan E. Rivers, Sara Shiffman, Nicole Lerner, Peter Salovey (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 780-795. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.780
Start the free EQTiger assessment for adults 18+. The free result includes a profile and strongest area; numeric scores and bands belong to the optional paid report. See methodology and limitations.
Related
- No. 01Schutte SSEIT: self-report EI explainedThe Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test is a 33-item questionnaire developed in 1998. It draws on the early Salovey-Mayer framework but gathers self-report rather than performance responses. SSEIT, SSRI, and related naming variants require careful identification of the actual measure.
- No. 02MSCEIT: model, editions, strengths, and limitsThe MSCEIT is a performance-based measure associated with the ability model of emotional intelligence. The original instrument and MSCEIT 2 are different editions, so research and administration details must be matched to the version. EQTiger is not an MSCEIT administration or equivalent score.
- No. 03WLEIS: Wong and Law EI scale explainedThe Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale is a 16-item self-report measure linked to an ability-model framework. Its four areas concern appraising one’s own and others’ emotions, using emotion, and regulating emotion. The self-report format must remain distinct from demonstrated performance.
Your next 9 minutes
Understand your emotions.
36 questions about everyday moments. A fresh starting point for reflection.
Free to take. Full report $6.95. One-time payment. No subscription.