Skip to content
EQTiger

Emotional Intelligence Interview Questions for Hiring Managers

Ask about specific past situations (a piece of hard feedback, a disagreement with a peer, a mistake that reached a customer) and probe for what the candidate noticed, what they did and what changed afterward. Ask every candidate the same questions and score each answer against a short written scale before you discuss it with anyone. Do not use self-report EQ questionnaires or online EQ tests, including EQTiger, to make the hiring decision.

By EQTiger EditorialUpdated Expert review pending

Try the skill on yourself.

“How would you rate your emotional intelligence?” is the least useful question you can ask. Every candidate says high, and the ones who say it most confidently may be the ones who notice least. What works is asking about real moments from their working life, the kind that will recur in your job, and listening for the details only someone who handled it well would think to mention. This page gives you the questions, what good and weak answers sound like, the probes that separate a rehearsed story from a real one, and a simple way to score them fairly.

If you are on the other side of the table, the companion page on showing emotional intelligence in a job interview is written for you, and the interview practice set lets you pick the strongest answer approach to each question and see why.

Twelve questions, grouped by the moment they test

Pick the three or four that match what the role demands. A support lead needs the customer and pressure questions; a new manager needs the feedback and conflict ones. Ask them as written, in the same order, for every candidate.

Taking and giving feedback

  1. “Tell me about the most useful criticism you’ve received at work. What did you do in the week after?”Listen for a change they made, not just that they “took it well”
  2. “Describe a time you had to tell a colleague their work wasn’t good enough. How did you open that conversation?”Listen for the actual first sentence they used

Pressure and setbacks

  1. “Walk me through a day when something went badly wrong and people were looking to you. What did you say first, and to whom?”Listen for sequence and for who they kept informed
  2. “Tell me about a mistake of yours that reached a customer or a manager. How did they find out?”Listen for whether they told people or were found out
  3. “When did work frustration last show in how you spoke to someone? What happened next?”A candidate with no example is either new to work or not looking closely

Disagreement and conflict

  1. “Tell me about a disagreement with a peer that you didn’t win. What did you do once the decision went the other way?”Listen for how they describe the other person
  2. “Describe a working relationship that started badly and got better. What changed it?”Listen for something they did, not just time passing
  3. “Have you ever raised a problem about a colleague with a manager? How did you decide it was time?”Listen for whether they tried to speak to the colleague first, where that was safe

Reading other people

  1. “Tell me about a time you realized a teammate was struggling before they said anything. What tipped you off?”Listen for concrete cues and for whether they checked their guess
  2. “Describe a customer or stakeholder who was upset about something that wasn’t your fault. What did you say in the first minute?”Listen for acknowledgment before explanation
  3. “When have you misread how someone felt about something? How did you find out?”Good answers admit the miss plainly
  4. “Tell me about a meeting where the mood shifted. What did you notice, and did you do anything about it?”Doing nothing can be a fine answer if they explain why

What a strong answer sounds like next to a weak one

Signals to listen for in emotional intelligence answers
Listen forStronger answerWeaker answer
SpecificsNames a month, a project, a person’s role, the words they used“I always try to stay calm and listen to everyone”
The other personExplains what the colleague wanted and why it made sense to themThe other person is lazy, difficult or “just negative”
Their own partSays what they got wrong or would do differentlyEvery problem was caused by someone else
What changedA habit, a process or a relationship is different afterwardThe story ends when the argument ends
Checking, not guessing“I asked her if the deadline was the problem”“I could tell exactly what he was thinking”

None of these signals requires the candidate to be warm, chatty or extroverted. A quiet person who describes a hard conversation in careful detail is showing more of the skill than a charming one who speaks in generalities. The answer on whether introverts can have high emotional intelligence goes into why that confusion is so common.

Probes that get past the rehearsed version

Many candidates arrive with polished stories. The probe is where you learn whether the story happened the way it is told. Use the same probes for everyone so the stronger storytellers don’t get an easier ride.

Follow-up probes

  1. “What exactly did you say to her? The words, as best you remember.”Moves the answer from summary to evidence
  2. “What do you think he would say about that conversation if I called him?”Tests perspective taking without asking for it by name
  3. “What would you do differently now?”Every real story has something
  4. “How did you know it had worked?”Separates outcomes from hopes

A 2014 review of two decades of research on structured interviews covers the same design choices this page uses: asking every candidate the same questions, past-behavior versus hypothetical questions, written rating scales, and how much to probe. (Levashina and colleagues, 2014) The review is also candid that many questions about structured interviews remain open, so treat these as sound practice, not a guarantee of a better hire.

Score each answer before anyone discusses it

A scoring routine for a panel

  1. Write the scale first15 min, onceFor each question, one line describing a 1 (vague, blames others, no change), a 3 (a real example with some detail) and a 5 (specific, fair to others, owns a mistake, something changed).
  2. Take notes on words, not impressionsduringWrite what they said. “Seemed great” is not a note.
  3. Score alone5 minEach interviewer scores every answer against the scale before the debrief.
  4. Then compare10 minDiscuss only the answers where scores differ by two points or more, using the notes.

Scoring before the debrief matters because the most senior or most confident voice in the room otherwise sets everyone’s view of a candidate. A score on paper is harder to quietly revise.

Hypothetical questions and situational tests

You can also describe a realistic situation from the job and ask what the candidate would do. That is the logic of a situational judgment test, and as a format it has a decent track record in hiring:

Situational judgment tests predicted job performance at useful levels, and they typically correlated with general cognitive ability as well.

Sample
A meta-analysis of 102 validity coefficients covering 10,640 people.
Effect size
ρ = .34 with job performance; ρ = .46 with general cognitive ability.
Limits
These were professionally built tests with scoring keys, not improvised interview questions, and the overlap with cognitive ability means part of what they predict is general reasoning.

The lesson for an interview is to write the scenario from your own job, decide in advance which responses you would count as strong, and score against that. A hypothetical asked on the fly and judged by gut feel loses most of what made the format work.

Why EQ questionnaires should stay out of hiring

It is tempting to add an emotional intelligence questionnaire to the process. The evidence argues against it. Across many workplace studies, self-reported EQ was linked to supervisor-rated performance at about ρ = .29, but that link disappeared once personality, self-efficacy, self-rated performance, ability EI and general mental ability were taken into account. (Joseph and colleagues, 2015) And in three studies, how people rated their own emotional abilities did not line up strongly with how they performed on an ability test. (Brackett and colleagues, 2006)

If you want to know what the EQTiger test is designed for, it is a private self-reflection exercise for the person taking it. For a wider view of how far online tests can be trusted, see whether online EQ tests are accurate.

Mistakes interviewers make with these questions

  • Rewarding fluency. A practiced storyteller is not necessarily the person who handled the moment best. Probe everyone equally.
  • Marking down a candidate for describing anger or anxiety honestly. Admitting the feeling and describing what they did with it is a strong answer.
  • Treating eye contact, warmth or small talk as evidence. Norms for all three vary across cultures and people, and none of them was in your scale.
  • Asking about personal territory. Stay with work situations; your HR team will know which topics are off limits where you hire.
  • Forgetting that the interview is a sample of the candidate’s worst-case stress. Some people tell their stories better on day thirty than in minute ten.

For what emotional skills actually add to job performance, and where the research is weaker than the hype, read how much emotional intelligence matters at work. If you are hiring a manager, the guide to emotionally intelligent leadership covers the behaviors worth asking about.

Research notes

  1. Levashina and colleagues, 2014: This review of two decades of research on structured employment interviews covers how structure is defined, how it reduces bias, impression management, situational versus past-behavior questions, rating scales and follow-up probing, and concludes that much is known while many questions remain open.

    The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241–293. Limits: A narrative review with some meta-analytic summaries; it maps the research rather than giving one effect size for interview structure. doi:10.1111/peps.12052

  2. McDaniel and colleagues, 2001: A meta-analysis (102 coefficients, 10,640 people) found situational judgment tests predict job performance at useful levels (rho = .34) and typically correlate with general cognitive ability (rho = .46).

    Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 730–740. Limits: Meta-analysis of workplace tests. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.730

  3. Joseph and colleagues, 2015: Mixed (self-report) EI correlated ρ = .29 with supervisor-rated job performance, but the link became nil (β = -.02) once ability EI, self-efficacy, self-rated performance, personality and general mental ability were controlled, because those constructs overlap heavily with mixed EI content (multiple R = .79).

    Why does self-reported emotional intelligence predict job performance? A meta-analytic investigation of mixed EI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 298–342. doi:10.1037/a0037681

  4. Brackett and colleagues, 2006: Across three studies, self-rated emotional abilities and MSCEIT performance scores were not strongly correlated, and only the performance test predicted observed social competence, and only for men.

    Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 780–795. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.780

3 questions

Frequently asked questions

Can I ask a candidate to take an EQ test?

We advise against using any online EQ test or self-report EQ questionnaire, including EQTiger, to decide who gets hired. These tools were not built or checked for that use, and self-rated EQ overlaps heavily with personality and self-confidence.

Are hypothetical questions useless?

No. “What would you do if…” questions can work when they describe a realistic situation from the job and are scored against an agreed key. Past-behavior questions are easier to probe, because there are real details to ask about.

How many emotional intelligence questions should one interview include?

Three or four, chosen for the moments that matter most in the role, are usually enough. More than that crowds out the technical questions and tires both of you.

Free · 36 questions

Check your own habits.

Thirty-six questions. Your strongest area is free.

Free to take. Full report $6.95, paid once.

Ask EQTiger

AI assistant, can make mistakes, not a therapist. Avoid sharing sensitive personal details.

What can I help with?

I can explain the assessment or point you to the right guide.